This week's New Scientist has an article by Simon Baron-Cohen, director of the Autism Research Centre at Cambridge, about recent misreporting of his research in the media.

The Guardian article that he complains misreported his work is here.

And here is the British Psychology Society press release that generated the media coverage.

Reading all of these, I was struck by how in the New Scientist article Baron-Cohen clearly explained that the subjects in the study did not actually develop autism, but rather they showed some traits "not necessarily indicative of autism".

But the press release does not contain such an explanation. It refers to "autistic traits" throughout, without that important caveat / explanation of those traits. Reading the press release first, then the Guardian article, could a non-specialist actually be forgiven for thinking the Guardian article was largely accurate?

And the press release has the following quote from Baron-Cohen:

"It is important to note that this research does not demonstrate that elevated foetal testosterone is associated with a clinical diagnosis of autism or Asperger Syndrome; to do that would need a sample size of thousands, not hundreds. Our ongoing collaboration with the Biobank in Denmark will enable us to test that link in the future".

...so is it really wrong for the headline to say that "New research brings autism screening closer to reality"?

Baron-Cohen clears the BPS press officer (and presumably himself, as he must have seen and approved the press release) of contributing to the situation. But I'm afraid I don't see it quite like that; sure the media over-hyped the story (and then fed on itself), but the press release could perhaps have contained the same clear explanation of the study that Baron-Cohen gives in the New Scientist article. But then, of course, it might not have garnered any coverage ("New study links testosterone in the womb to traits that are not necessarily indicative of autism...").

Overall, a useful perspective from a scientist about media coverage of their work. But I can't help being vaguely reminded of an aphorism about glass houses and throwing stones.

Views: 1

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Connecting Science to add comments!

Join Connecting Science

Latest Activity

Profile Icon

Slinn Pickings and ChemSpy daily posts by me

Blog post by Robert N Slinn Jan 23
Profile Icon
Daily update for ChemSpy http://ning.it/ywzqu8
Status posted by Robert N Slinn Jan 23
Profile Icon

Introductions

Hi Everyone I am proud to announce (although some of you already know), that Immersive Theatres - 360° Mobile Experiences is here and trading! I have set up my own, part-time business all to do with operating digital mobile domes. My mission is to be 'Unique in some ways and exatly the same in other ways' - so apart from high quality astronomy shows, look out for weddings, birthdays and even picnics under an inflable dome! Over the years I have found (and no doubt you have too) many constomers…See More
Blog post by Zeeshaan Dinally Jan 2
Profile Icon

Coventry Astronomy Show 2012 at Coventry, CV3 2QD

Thumbnail
March 17, 2012 from 12pm to 8pm
A day of lectures and workshops on Saturday 17th March 2012, 12:00 - 21:00Ernesford Grange School, Princethorpe Way, Coventry, West Midlands. CV3 2QDWith professional speakers, workshops for younger participants, trade stands and a digital planetarium you're sure to be kept busy until dark...See More
Event posted by Zeeshaan Dinally Dec 21, 2011

© 2012   Created by Claire Ainsworth.   Powered by .

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service